a numerical trendp = 0.462
the “lower 50%”, although there was a numerical trend towards longer OS with sunitinib-axitinib (median OS: 18.1 vs. 16.0 months; HR: 0.86 [0.56–1.29]; p = 0.462).
the “lower 50%”, although there was a numerical trend towards longer OS with sunitinib-axitinib (median OS: 18.1 vs. 16.0 months; HR: 0.86 [0.56–1.29]; p = 0.462).
In patients with worse response to sunitinib, sunitinib-axitinib was associated with a trend towards greater OS compared to sunitinib-everolimus, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.