highly significantP = 0.0007
Pairwise comparisons showed a highly significant increase in similarity in PK pairs (PK: paired: M = 0.03, SD = 0.04; shuffled: M = −0.01, SD = 0.02; t (18) = 4.1, P = 0.0007, CI: [0.018–0.058], Cohen’s d = 0.94).
Pairwise comparisons showed a highly significant increase in similarity in PK pairs (PK: paired: M = 0.03, SD = 0.04; shuffled: M = −0.01, SD = 0.02; t (18) = 4.1, P = 0.0007, CI: [0.018–0.058], Cohen’s d = 0.94).
forgotten: t (17) = 2.48, P = 0.02, CI: [−0.14–(−0.01)], Cohen’s d = 0.58; approaching significance for n-PK pairs, remembered vs. forgotten: t (17) = 1.92, P = 0.07, CI: [−0.008–0.17], Cohen’s d = 0.45).