almost significantP =.06
However, the posthoc analysis showed a significant difference only between normal and dementia groups ( P =.002) and an almost significant P value when comparing normal and MCI ( P =.06) groups.
However, the posthoc analysis showed a significant difference only between normal and dementia groups ( P =.002) and an almost significant P value when comparing normal and MCI ( P =.06) groups.
However, as can be seen in Figure 4 , only for the digitized version, we can observe a clear trend with fewer targets identified as the diagnosis worsened.
This behavior is reflected in the NIDmin indicator, which presents an increasing trend with the worsening of the diagnosis, although not statistically significant (normal: 1 [IQR 1.5], MCI: 2 [IQR 3], and dementia: 3 [IQR 3.5]).