More than half of the indexes in the literature on SRs showed that when p > 0.10, 0% ≤ I 2 < 50%, the homogeneity indicates no heterogeneity, and the score is 3 points; 0.10 ≥ p ≥ 0.05, 50% ≤ I 2 ≤ 75% is regarded as slightly significant heterogeneity with a score of 2 points, and 0.05 > p , I 2 > 75% is considered significant heterogeneity with a score 1 point. 24 If the publication bias is ignored, the risk of publication bias would be high. 25 The scoring system was as> follows: in each project, the worst study gets a minimum score of 1 point, the second-to-last study gets 2 points, and so on.
← all excerpts
Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot.
1
—
—