“slightly significant”

Auditory spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) (Figure 9C,Di ) were only moderately affected in Otogl +/− mutant mice relative to Otogl +/+ controls, with a slightly significant change in response latency ( p = 7.10 −8 , nested two‐way ANOVA, group effect, animal factor nested in group, F(1,1379) = 29.5) and a 5.8% decrease in frequency bandwidth ( p = 0.048, nested ANOVA, F(1,1379) = 3.9), with no change in maximum evoked firing rate ( p = 0.06, nested ANOVA, F(1,1379) = 3.5).

The GOEAST analysis only reveals some slightly significant overrepresented GO-terms, as, for example, the Molecular Function alpha-glucosidase activity ( P -value = 2.91E −7 ).

Results Correlation analysis between CNV values obtained with the two methods was slightly significant ( R = 0.413, p = 0.00002), because of the wider data dispersion in qPCR compared with ddPCR.

The participants generally enjoyed navigating the three scenarios, but slightly significant differences were observed for pleasantness ( p < 0.0001), to a lesser extent, within the supermarket (mean score of 3.77 ± 0.62, median 4) compared with that within the museum (mean score of 4.14 ± 0.63, median of 4) and the highest level in the city scenario (mean score of 4.41 ± 0.67, median 5).

The similarity between the two groups was also evaluated using PERMANOVA, which showed slightly significant differences between the HCC and control groups: p -value < 0.0001, but the pseudo-F value is low (pseudo-F = 1.43). 2.3.

(X) p > 0.05 was considered non-significant; (*) p < 0.05 was considered significant; (**) p < 0.01 was considered slightly significant and (***) p < 0.0001 highly significant.

Additionally, there was a slightly significant negative correlation between RA and MS (correlation coefficient = -0.46, P = 8.3 × 10 − 4 ), and a slight but significant positive correlation between MS and T1D (correlation coefficient = 0.20, P = 0.041).

3.4 Simple Linear Regressions and Correlations Between Tau‐PET Signal and Cognition Simple linear regression between [ 18 F]MK‐6240 tau PET quantitative data and the global cognitive Z ‐score in the Aβ− population was slightly significant for the Braak ≤ 2 region ( R 2 = 0.13; p = 0.001), mostly driven by a few Aβ− uMCI and two FTD subjects.

There was only a slightly significant relationship in the area of relationship with one's co-workers (P<0.001, r: 0.24) ( Table 3 ).

The antenatal depression scores significantly decreased from pre-intervention to post-intervention (mean difference = 4.00, p < 0.001), and there was a slightly significant decline from post-intervention to follow-up (mean difference = 1.167, p = 0.001).

Hemolytic anemia was shown to be significantly lower in our series than that reported in Saudi Arabian SLE patients (16% versus 63.1%, p < 0.001) and higher than Tunisians but slightly significant (16% versus 6%, p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Significance levels were set at p > 0.05 (not significant), 0.05 ≥ p > 0.01 (slightly significant), 0.01 ≥ p > 0.001 (significant) and p ≤ 0.001 (highly significant).

Correlations between variables In this study, antenatal depression was found to have a moderately significant positive correlation with pregnancy stress (r=.52, p <.001), a moderately significant negative correlation with self-esteem (r=–.49, p <.001), and a slightly significant negative correlation with social support (r=–.24, p =.001).

However, we detected (Table 2 ) a slightly significant lifespan modulation (LogRank p = 0.002) when klotho knockdown was assessed in a daf-2 (m577) genetic background (Figure 4C ).

The Control Group, on the other hand, showed slightly significant changes in body water content (2.1%, p = 0.002), muscle volume (2.0%, p = 0.002), lean muscle mass (2.0%, p = 0.002) and basal metabolism (1.4%, p = 0.002).

For histopathological data, the levels of significance were defined as: 0.0025< P ≤0.0125: * (slightly significant); 0.00025< P ≤0.0025: ** (significant); P ≤0.00025: *** (highly significant).

The random effect module was implemented due to slightly significant heterogeneity across the studies (I 2 = 55.8%, P = 0.003).

Sensitivity analyses were conducted with increased nursing minutes, resulting in slightly significant direct unit-costs for the palliative care unit ( p -value = 0.003), but not for the palliative care advisory team ( p -value < 0.001, see supplementary Table 2, Appendix 3 ).

However, after one month of continuous use, the difference becomes slightly significant (I.e., p = 0.003).

CpG2 in OVAT is the only site representing slightly significant higher methylation levels in obese than in lean subjects ( P = 0.003).

For 30-day graft survival the association was slightly significant (HR 1.268 95% CI 1.073–1.499 per 10-h increase, p = 0.005).

Additionally, we observed a borderline slightly significant interaction of ffaZOL with the adverse effect of age on the number of dominant follicles (Poisson LR (72): 7.92, p < 0.005, Disp = 2.16, Quasi- p = 0.0072). 2.2.

Layer-by-layer comparison resulted in slightly significant differences revealed by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA (χ 2 = 16.7, p = 0.005), although post-hoc tests did not show any relevant differences between layers (Fig. 4 b red bars, 4 d, n = 4).

In fact, slightly significant negative correlations between FABP1 (r = −0.27, p-value = 5.49 × 10 −03 ), FADS1 (r = −0.36, p-value = 1.93 × 10 −04 ) and FADS2 (r = −0.34, p-value = 4.46 × 10 −04 ) mRNA levels and BF C18:3(n-3) were observed ( Fig. 4 ).

Similarly, the interaction between the lipid phase concentration and homogenization time (X 1 X 3 ) showed a slightly significant negative effect on SE% ( p = 0.0066) ( Fig. 1 (a-III)).