nominally significantp = 0.069
The model was significant (R 2 = 0.204, Adjusted R 2 = 0.165, F (3,62) = 5.29, p = 0.003) with a nominally significant contribution from sexual abuse (β = −0.21, t = −1.85, p = 0.069).
The model was significant (R 2 = 0.204, Adjusted R 2 = 0.165, F (3,62) = 5.29, p = 0.003) with a nominally significant contribution from sexual abuse (β = −0.21, t = −1.85, p = 0.069).
However, given our study's highly significant group differences in childhood trauma, the difference in minimization or denial is unlikely to explain the elevated rates found in participants with schizophrenia.