Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Image Quality and Interpretation of [<sup>18</sup>F]-FES-PET: Is There any Effect of Food Intake?

Diagnostics (Basel) · 2020 · PMC7600120 · PMID 32993099

2
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

An inverse relationship regarding physiological [ 18 F]-FES uptake was seen for the small bowel, with the lowest median tracer uptake in the fasting group (1.9 (1.3–6.1)) and highest for the chocolate group (5.5 (1.5–10.8); p = 0.17; Table 2 and Figure 4 )), although the effect of food intake did not reach statistical significance yet.

also in 111,027 other papers

a nonsignificant trendno p-value reported
A previous case report presented [ 18 F]-FES-PET findings of a patient with metastatic lobular BC with gastric linitis plastic [ 20 ], in which the chocolate protocol may possibly have facilitated tumor detection because of a nonsignificant trend towards lower uptake in the stomach wall.

also in 5,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.