showed a trendP = 0.05
RYGB showed a trend toward higher “bite” frequency ( P = 0.05, Fig. 5 f) compared to Sham, but no difference appeared for “sniff” frequency ( P = 0.14, Fig. 5 g).
RYGB showed a trend toward higher “bite” frequency ( P = 0.05, Fig. 5 f) compared to Sham, but no difference appeared for “sniff” frequency ( P = 0.14, Fig. 5 g).