marginally significantp = 0.050
This was confirmed by Kruskal–Wallis H tests, revealing marginally significant group differences for RHR (χ2 = 5.98, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.19 [−0.01, 0.08]).
This was confirmed by Kruskal–Wallis H tests, revealing marginally significant group differences for RHR (χ2 = 5.98, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.19 [−0.01, 0.08]).
Linear regression analyses showed a trend-level relationship between RHR and CAARMS severity [adjusted R 2 = 0.013, F (1, 199) = 3.764, p = 0.053] as well as distress [adjusted R 2 = 0.014, F (1, 201) = 3.887, p = 0.050].