marginally significantp =.02
The same correlation for the AM participants was marginally significant, r = .41, t (29) = 2.39, p =.02 (cf.
The same correlation for the AM participants was marginally significant, r = .41, t (29) = 2.39, p =.02 (cf.
However, the correlation between the slopes for PSA across the Mandarin and Arabic conditions failed to reach statistical significance, r = .26, t (61) = 2.1, ns (see Fig. 3 , top-right hand panel).