How do programmes to prevent intimate partner violence among the general population impact women with disabilities? Post-hoc analysis of three randomised controlled trials.

In contrast, women with disabilities reported a borderline significant increase in overall alcohol use (ß=3.42, p=0.06), in contrast to a non-significant decrease among women without disabilities (ß=−1.14, p=0.10); while both of these measures were borderline on their own, there was a significant interaction between disability status and alcohol use, with women with disabilities in the intervention are scoring a mean 4.55 points higher (p=0.02).

also in 11,409 other papers

However, reductions in sexual IPV and severe physical/sexual IPV at endline among the women with disabilities had point estimates identical to those for women without disabilities, and remained marginally significant at the p<0.10 level.

also in 26,082 other papers

The intervention benefit with respect to earnings in the past month was only significant for women who reported no disability at baseline (aOR=2.12, p=0.001); women with disability did not appear to see any benefit in the past month income (aOR=0.97, p=0.94), however, the interaction between disability status and the intervention did not reach statistical significance (p=0.10).

also in 111,027 other papers