a trend level of significanceP = .058
Overall, the rate of THDC malfunction was lower at a trend level of significance, with heparin vs saline locking (24.3% vs 54.6%; P = .058).
Overall, the rate of THDC malfunction was lower at a trend level of significance, with heparin vs saline locking (24.3% vs 54.6%; P = .058).
The only exception was that the coefficient for the increased VTE prophylaxis dosage was only marginally significant in the competing risks model, although the magnitude of the estimate remained similar.