highly significantp < 0.0001
The logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.35).
The logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.35).
How does a ROC AUC of 80.2% compare with other models? LIMITATIONS Suggest removing italic numbers throughout P12L222 – When discussing sample size type 2 errors should be discussed for some of the results that demonstrated trends but failed to reach statistical significance P12L225 – Need to discuss the variation in trauma epidemiology / trauma networks and systems / type (% blunt) / pre-hospital care / REBOA practices etc across the 22 centres and 13 different countries.