highly significantp < 0.001
6 , and the correlation between them was weak but highly significant (Spearman’s rho = 0.39; p < 0.001).
6 , and the correlation between them was weak but highly significant (Spearman’s rho = 0.39; p < 0.001).
As already observed for T-error, also N-error was higher in populations experiencing a negative trend, rather than population with a positive or constant dynamic (Fig. 2 ).