0.07 ± 0.05 mm) and marginally significant benefits in mRC (88.36 ± 15.45 % vs. 74.63 ± 8.05 %) for L-PRF-treated sites compared to sites that received CAF alone, respectively [ 23 ].
← all excerpts
Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Single and Multiple Coronally Advanced Flap for Type 1 Recession: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
2
—
—
The sentences
CAF Alone A borderline significant trend towards a higher mRC favoring CAF + L-PRF vs.