In terms of the primary endpoint, there was a clinically relevant difference in sleep efficiency of >8% (as established in previous trials) (9.9%; 95% CI: [−0.2%; 20.0%]) in favor of the oronasal mask ( Table 2 , Figure 2A ), but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0537).
← all excerpts
Oronasal versus Nasal Masks for Non-Invasive Ventilation in COPD: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
1
0.0537
0.0537