highly significantp < .001
This difference was highly significant (T = 6.847, df = 108, p < .001).
This difference was highly significant (T = 6.847, df = 108, p < .001).
Here, a clearly significant time x group interaction can be seen (Wilk’s lamba = 0.88; p = .004; partial eta 2 = .12).
This result was confirmed by the secondary analysis, a repeated measure analysis of variance of all variables, where the Oswestry Disability Score and the Quality of Life Score (PLC) just missed significance, and the Finger-to-Floor Distance was also highly significant.