Risk factors for eating disorders: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses.

38 , 39 , 44 , 50 , 53 In brief, associations that presented nominally significant random-effects summary effect sizes (i.e., p < 0.05) were ranked as convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, or weak evidence based on the number of events, the strength of the association, and the presence of several biases (criteria presented in Box 1 ).

also in 7,732 other papers