Like the other ALMs, repetition proportion showed means for the ASD group that were indicative of more atypicality than for the other two groups, but differences fell just short of statistical significance.
← all excerpts
Evaluating atypical language in autism using automated language measures.
3
—
—
The sentences
Repetition proportion did not reach statistical significance ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p = .075$$\end{document} p = . 075 ); as explained above, this may simply reflect its low sensitivity when measuring an infrequent language characteristic.
Repetition proportion followed the same pattern, but did not quite reach significance.