Point estimates favored the RA and NT, consistent with the patency findings, although the aggregate outcomes did not reach statistical significance (RA: IRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58–1.16, NT‐SV: IRR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49–1.70; RITA: IRR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.77–2.80; GEA: IRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.04–4.38).
← all excerpts
Angiographic Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
1
—
—