Task Error The decrease in task error was significant or marginally significant during training for the RT group (week 3: p = 0.02; week 6: p = 0.053) and post-training for the CT group (week 12: p = 0.04; week 24: p = 0.055, Figure 4C ).
While the subjects of the RT group had numerically larger FMA gains at the end of training and at the last follow up session (week 6 and 24) compared to the CT group (Week 6: RT: 4.41 and CT: 3.00; Week 24: RT: 5.38 and CT: 4.5), this did not reach statistical significance (Week 6: p = 0.19; Week 24: p = 0.32) (mean ± standard deviation of the changes compared to baseline; RT [points]: Wk 0–6: 4.41 ± 3.46; Wk 0–24: 5.38 ± 4.67 and CT [points]: Wk 0–6: 3.00 ± 4.00; Wk 0–24: 4.50 ± 5.35).