nearly significantp = 0.053
In Figure 4 , a nearly significant cross-correlation at –lag 2 ( r = −0.261; p = 0.053, n.s.) is seen between CAM techniques experienced as positive and fatigue.
In Figure 4 , a nearly significant cross-correlation at –lag 2 ( r = −0.261; p = 0.053, n.s.) is seen between CAM techniques experienced as positive and fatigue.