Sitting in Judgment: How Body Posture Influences Deception Detection and Gazing Behavior.

Behav Sci (Basel) · 2021 · PMC8229315 · PMID 34200633

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0760

closest p · 1.5× alpha

0.0760

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.076so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Considering each AOI separately, the planned t -tests revealed a marginally significant effect for the Open posture judges ( M = 1.3, SD = 0.9) fixating fewer times at the hands than the Closed posture judges ( M = 2.2, SD = 1.6), t (30) = −1.84, p = 0.076, d s = −0.65, 95% CI (−1.36, 0.07) (square root-transformed data).

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported

With respect to the judgment data, judges adopting an open posture showed a trend towards higher accuracy compared to their closed posture counterparts.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.