highly significantp < 0.0001
The latter was highly significant compared to the values of the WT littermates (mixed effects analysis, genotype p < 0.0001, age p < 0.0001, interaction p < 0.0001; Sidak’s post-hoc test 12 m, p = 0.0001).
The latter was highly significant compared to the values of the WT littermates (mixed effects analysis, genotype p < 0.0001, age p < 0.0001, interaction p < 0.0001; Sidak’s post-hoc test 12 m, p = 0.0001).
For all other lines, exploration times between the novel and familiar object did not reach statistical significance, although there is some trend for more exploration of the novel object ( Figure 7 ).