Perpetrator pose reinstatement during a lineup test increases discrimination accuracy.

Sci Rep · 2021 · PMC8271008 · PMID 34244529

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

did not quite reach statistical significancep = 0.060so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The results of a signal-detection model fit to the data partially agreed with the p AUC results reported here: d ′ was estimated to be higher in the right-profile (2.14) than the left-profile (1.95) encoding condition, but that difference did not quite reach statistical significance, χ 2 (1) = 3.55, p = 0.060.

also in 679 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Again, when we fit a signal-detection model to the data (Supplementary Appendix B ), the results agreed with the p AUC results reported here: d ′ was estimated to be greater for the high pose-reinstatement group (2.14) than the low pose-reinstatement group (1.97), though that difference did not reach statistical significance, χ 2 (1) = 3.04, p = 0.08.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.