From repeating routes to planning novel routes: the impact of landmarks and ageing on route integration and cognitive mapping.

56.71%; t (231.92) = 6.48, p < 0.001, d = 0.84]; retrace vs novel route [69.81 vs 56.71%; t (227.72) = 3.81, p < 0.001, d = 0.50], while performance difference between repeat and retrace did not reach statistical significance (76.15 vs. 69.81%; t (219.53) = 1.92, p = 0.057, d = 0.25).

also in 111,027 other papers

It is important to note, however, that we observed a highly significant age difference, despite essentially selecting for good navigators.

also in 132,142 other papers