Despite no differences in dominant vibration frequency, responders H (lower damping coefficient in hard shoe) showed a trend of a slightly greater BMI (shorter and heavier), slower running speed and greater calf volume and soft-tissue mass compared to responders S (lower damping coefficient in a soft shoe).
← all excerpts
Soft-tissue vibration and damping response to footwear changes across a wide range of anthropometrics in running.
1
—
—