showed a trendP = 0.06
Although CCT showed a trend towards improved detection of peri-annular complications (% vs 89%; P = 0.06), TEE was more sensitive for the detection of leaflet perforation (79% vs 48%; P < 0.05)[ 50 ].
Although CCT showed a trend towards improved detection of peri-annular complications (% vs 89%; P = 0.06), TEE was more sensitive for the detection of leaflet perforation (79% vs 48%; P < 0.05)[ 50 ].