Visual Search Asymmetry Due to the Relative Magnitude Represented by Number Symbols.

Vision (Basel) · 2021 · PMC8482119 · PMID 34564340

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0410

closest p · 0.8× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.041actually significant

The interaction between set size and target size was marginally significant, F (3,16) = 3.598, p = 0.041, η p 2 = 0.435, but as illustrated in Figure 3 , the target size effect is not completely eliminated with set sizes of 2 or 3 items.

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The difference between stimulus sets (2/5 and 6/9) did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.052), nor were there any significant interactions between target presence, stimulus set, and relative target size.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.