Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Age differences in sustained attention tasks: A meta-analysis.

Psychon Bull Rev · 2021 · PMC8642381 · PMID 33772477

1
hedged sentence
0.2870
closest p · 5.7× alpha
0.2870
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = .287not close (p > 0.1)
Thus, these results indicate no observed heterogeneity, with the important caveat of the low number of included studies. Accuracy on go trials In the accuracy on go trial analysis, older adults were numerically less accurate on go trials than younger adults, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (Hedges’ g = −.18, SE = .17, 95% CI [−.56, .19], 95% prediction interval [−1.36, 1], Z = −1.06, two-tailed p = .287), probably because of a ceiling effect in most studies.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.