The performance differences are quite significant: the average maximum in-band matching is better by 1.5 dB when using absolute versus relative sizing, whereas relative parameterization leads to size reduction better by 25 mm 2 (or about ten percent) as compared to the absolute one (again, when averaged over all algorithm runs and all considered antenna structures).
← all excerpts
On geometry parameterization for simulation-driven design closure of antenna structures.
1
—
—