However, there was a tendency for URSL to have a better SFR than SWL in the <1 cm group, but it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06, OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.11–1.05, I2 = 81%).
← all excerpts
A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size.
1
0.0600
0.0600