In the preventable crisis history condition, after participants read the diminish strategy, no significant differences were found between T2 ( M = 14.79, SD = 5.76) and T1 ( M = 14.28, SD = 4.899), p > 0.05; after participants read the rebuild strategy, T2 ( M = 16.08, SD = 4.959) was significantly higher than T1 ( M = 14.46, SD = 5.23), p < 0.001 (see Figure 4 ). Discussion The results of Study 2 showed that under the victim crisis history condition, the difference between T2 and T1 when using the diminish strategy was only marginally significant.
← all excerpts
Repairing Charity Trust in Times of Accidental Crisis: The Role of Crisis History and Crisis Response Strategy.
1
—
—