Image quality scores comparison for iNAV versus dNAV aortic CMRA Overall diagnostic confidence was higher for the proposed iNAV sequence versus the clinical dNAV sequence for all three reviewers, although it did not reach statistical significance (Reviewer 1: 3.9 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.4, P = 0.7; Reviewer 2: 4.0 ± 0.2 vs. 3.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.4; Reviewer 3: 3.8 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.3).
← all excerpts
Efficient non-contrast enhanced 3D Cartesian cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta in 3 min.
1
0.7000
0.7000