borderline significantp = 0.05
Borderline significant differences between the BMI measurements across the TNM-stages is shown (p = 0.05).
Borderline significant differences between the BMI measurements across the TNM-stages is shown (p = 0.05).
CA19-9 aside, when using specific cut-off values for our independent negative predictors against metastatic PDAC in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the effect size in predicting metastatic PDAC is statistically highly significant ( Table 6 ).
The majority of distal lesions (83.3%) were locally advanced and advanced disease stages 3 or 4, compared to 53.1% of in patients with proximal lesions, although this did not reach statistical significance probably due to small numbers and hence a Type II error.