a strong trendp = 0.0538
In Cohort 5, post-hoc analysis showed no statistical difference, although a strong trend of increase in paw slips in QuilA-EAE mice compared to CTL was observed at D30 (Sidak test, p = 0.0538) ( Figure 2D , bottom ).
In Cohort 5, post-hoc analysis showed no statistical difference, although a strong trend of increase in paw slips in QuilA-EAE mice compared to CTL was observed at D30 (Sidak test, p = 0.0538) ( Figure 2D , bottom ).