close to significancep = 0.16
Interestingly, at baseline the prediction of caloric intake from the magnitude of liking ratings of the most preferred pudding sampled during session 1 was close to significance and stronger in the at risk SBPp patients (r = 0.38, p = 0.16, Fig 5B right ) than in SBPr patients (r = - 0.14, p = 0.53, Fig 5B middle ).