nominally significantp = 0.018
For volume LQ, there was a nominally significant effect ( t (294) = 2.38, p = 0.018), indicating that left-handers (1.21, SD = 3.58) had a more positive LQ than right-handers (−0.49, SD = 3.48).
For volume LQ, there was a nominally significant effect ( t (294) = 2.38, p = 0.018), indicating that left-handers (1.21, SD = 3.58) had a more positive LQ than right-handers (−0.49, SD = 3.48).
For surface LQ, the effect failed to reach significance ( p = 0.08).