Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Duration, frequency, and time distortion: Which is the best predictor of problematic smartphone use in adolescents? A trace data study.

PLoS One · 2022 · PMC8856513 · PMID 35180248

3
hedged sentences
0.0540
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.1000
boldest claim

The sentences

partially significantp = .054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Time distortion also had a partially significant effect (β = -.233, p = .054).

also in 417 other papers

marginally significantp < .10so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Due to the small sample size, we decided to highlight marginally significant effects (p < .10) when reporting the regression results [ 65 ].

also in 26,082 other papers

a significant trendno p-value reported
We think that marginally significant regression results deserve mentioning, since our analyses are of explorative nature and no other study exists on the relationship between trace smartphone use and PSU in adolescence, thus we cannot ignore a significant trend which can be informative for future research.

also in 9,775 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.