Metrics and methods in the evaluation of prestige bias in peer review: A case study in computer systems conferences.

PLoS One · 2022 · PMC8880855 · PMID 35213600

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0000

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0000

boldest claim

The sentences

quite significantp < 10 −9actually significant

The difference in medians, 13, is also quite significant ( W = 1075516.5, p < 10 −9 ).

also in 5,705 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.