Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Computerized Decision Support for Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT Urography: Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy in Multi-Institution Multi-Specialty Study.

Tomography · 2022 · PMC8938803 · PMID 35314631

3
hedged sentences
0.0510
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.7760
boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significancep = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The five oncologists had significant improvement for the difficult subset ( p = 0.009), but a borderline significance for the easy subset ( p = 0.051). 3.3.

also in 7,017 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.244not close (p > 0.1)
The improvement gained by the urologist and the neurology fellow did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.244 and p = 0.083, respectively).

also in 111,027 other papers

did not achieve significancep = 0.776not close (p > 0.1)
Observer #9 with CDSS-T aid had a larger AUC (0.81) than CDSS-T alone (0.80), but the difference did not achieve significance ( p = 0.776).

also in 1,397 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.