highly significantp=0.00001
In the ACS patients, the bleeding rate showed a highly significant difference between the short DAPT vs . standard DAPT, with a risk ratio 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.74; z=4.56, p=0.00001) (Fig. 4A ).
In the ACS patients, the bleeding rate showed a highly significant difference between the short DAPT vs . standard DAPT, with a risk ratio 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.74; z=4.56, p=0.00001) (Fig. 4A ).
The analysis showed a higher bleeding rate in the standard DAPT group, but this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 2A ).