slightly non-significantp = 0.05
There was a slightly non-significant larger proportion of females in the case group (17 female, 19% in control vs. 13 female, 38% in case group; p = 0.05).
There was a slightly non-significant larger proportion of females in the case group (17 female, 19% in control vs. 13 female, 38% in case group; p = 0.05).
4 c and d illustrate jittered scatter plots for distribution of AHD and CSA values of different individuals, showing a clear trend of small AHD with large CSA in combination for either RCT and/or CFD.