marginally significantp = 0.06
3 a), there was a significant interaction between condition and genotype for 2 weeks (F(1,46) = 5.44, p = 0.02), while the effect in the 6-week group was marginally significant (F(1,42) = 4.829, p = 0.06).
3 a), there was a significant interaction between condition and genotype for 2 weeks (F(1,46) = 5.44, p = 0.02), while the effect in the 6-week group was marginally significant (F(1,42) = 4.829, p = 0.06).
Further investigation found that although there was a trend toward significance in the dorsal cortex ( p = 0.068, etasq = 0.08) this result was driven by a significant effect in the septum (2 weeks: M = 0.60, SD = 0.57; 6 weeks: M = 4.04, SD = 2.79; p < 0.0001, etasq = 0.48).
Given the findings that our mice showed a trend for a loss of function that is consistent with previous findings and thus a suitable model, we assessed for differences between sham and rTMS in full experiment groups to determine if stimulation may help boost such deficits.