approached significancep = .065
In the same analysis on ERs, only the interaction of response relation and stimulus relation approached significance, F (1,31) = 3.65, p = .065, η p 2 = .11, with a pattern suggesting stimulus-response binding.
In the same analysis on ERs, only the interaction of response relation and stimulus relation approached significance, F (1,31) = 3.65, p = .065, η p 2 = .11, with a pattern suggesting stimulus-response binding.
The interaction of R2 relation and time of stimulus-response binding measurement, F (1,31) = 5.68, p = .023, η p 2 = .16, was also significant. In the same analysis on ERs, the main effect of R2 relation came close to significance, F (1,31) = 2.99, p = .094, η p 2 = .09.