approached significancep = 0.057
64%, respectively; t (21) = -2.81, p = 0.01] while the difference approached significance for the self-selected piece (Own), t (21) = -2.02, p = 0.057.
64%, respectively; t (21) = -2.81, p = 0.01] while the difference approached significance for the self-selected piece (Own), t (21) = -2.02, p = 0.057.
Examination of the second pre-performance condition showed a statistical trend ( p = 0.1) for a positive association between LFms 2 activity and flow.
We observed a significant inverse relationship between flow state and the LF/HF ratio in the pre-performance phase, while observing a trend toward significance for a positive relationship between the LF/HF ratio and flow as well as LFms 2 and flow during performance.