Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Age and sex associations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses post BNT162b2 vaccination in healthcare workers: A mixed effects model across two vaccination periods.

PLoS One · 2022 · PMC9053797 · PMID 35486622

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0430
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.001actually significant
marginally significantp = 0.092so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Mixed effects model analysis showed that there were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between the 21–30 years group (youngest vaccinees) and the 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 groups, as well as a marginally significant difference (p = 0.092) between the 21–30 and the 61–72 years group ( Table 7 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

a significant trendp = 0.002actually significant
In both cases, a strong association was found between gender and regional pain by three exact tests of independence (Pearson’s chi-squared, likelihood-ratio, and Fisher’s exact test), indicating a significant trend for women to develop this reaction compared to men (p = 0.002 and p<0.001 for the first and second vaccine dose across tests, respectively).

also in 9,775 other papers

marginally statistically significantp = 0.043actually significant
The corresponding correlations of male and female age groups with titers for the second period was -0.36 and- 0.07975, respectively, and they were marginally statistically significant (p = 0.043) and not significant (0.48), correspondingly.

also in 1,110 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.