did not reach statistical significancep = 0.3793
DJOS and DiOS were associated with a visible trend towards higher expression, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (DJOS vs sham p = 0.3793; DiOS vs sham p = 0.1851; DJOS vs.
DJOS and DiOS were associated with a visible trend towards higher expression, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (DJOS vs sham p = 0.3793; DiOS vs sham p = 0.1851; DJOS vs.