a clear trendP = 0.001
S2B), there was a clear trend between the different mat types ( R = 0.3772, P = 0.001) corresponding to their relative elevations, with polygonal mats sitting between smooth and blister mats ( Fig. 3A ).
S2B), there was a clear trend between the different mat types ( R = 0.3772, P = 0.001) corresponding to their relative elevations, with polygonal mats sitting between smooth and blister mats ( Fig. 3A ).