Overlaid above this, there is a clear trend of TRIPOD type 3 or 4 study designs obtaining higher methodological robustness ratings than TRIPOD types 1B, 2A, or 2B, with TRIPOD type 1A study designs tending towards the lower methodological ratings.
← all excerpts
Methodological quality of machine learning-based quantitative imaging analysis studies in esophageal cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcome prediction after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
1
—
—